<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this a good computer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php</link>
	<description>Yale Wireless Alarm &#124; Response Wirefree Alarm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james w</title>
		<link>http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php/comment-page-1#comment-15111</link>
		<dc:creator>james w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php#comment-15111</guid>
		<description>No, Geforce 9100 graphics are poor for gaming, and the processor is pretty weak these days. Look for a Core 2 Duo processor and a Geforce 8800 or 9600 GT/ Radeon 4670 at the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Geforce 9100 graphics are poor for gaming, and the processor is pretty weak these days. Look for a Core 2 Duo processor and a Geforce 8800 or 9600 GT/ Radeon 4670 at the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbox.jse</title>
		<link>http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php/comment-page-1#comment-15112</link>
		<dc:creator>redbox.jse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php#comment-15112</guid>
		<description>i like it better than the other one you asked about. this one has a better video card (still not the best by any means). but if you go with a dual core, at least try to get one with at least 3.0 ghz.

if you can, go with a core 2 quad, or if you feel like it, an AMD phenom x4, with at least 2.6 ghz.

in the next couple of years, programs and applications will become even more demanding, and you will want that extra power.

i would suggest making your own computer. it is not very difficult, and you can learn a lot about computers in the process as well as making a pretty decent computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like it better than the other one you asked about. this one has a better video card (still not the best by any means). but if you go with a dual core, at least try to get one with at least 3.0 ghz.</p>
<p>if you can, go with a core 2 quad, or if you feel like it, an AMD phenom x4, with at least 2.6 ghz.</p>
<p>in the next couple of years, programs and applications will become even more demanding, and you will want that extra power.</p>
<p>i would suggest making your own computer. it is not very difficult, and you can learn a lot about computers in the process as well as making a pretty decent computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leastdeaths</title>
		<link>http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php/comment-page-1#comment-15113</link>
		<dc:creator>leastdeaths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homesecuritysolutions.co.uk/is-this-a-good-computer.php#comment-15113</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s decent to above decent.  Not the best out there, but it&#039;s overall pretty good.  It really depends on what you&#039;re using it for.  The only place it lacks, and it really doesn&#039;t even there, is the processor being dual core and not quad.  However, it&#039;s a high end dual core.  Also something I saw that you may not want is the 64-bit edition of Vista as opposed to the 32-bit that everyone&#039;s used to.  This may cause some problems with software compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s decent to above decent.  Not the best out there, but it&#8217;s overall pretty good.  It really depends on what you&#8217;re using it for.  The only place it lacks, and it really doesn&#8217;t even there, is the processor being dual core and not quad.  However, it&#8217;s a high end dual core.  Also something I saw that you may not want is the 64-bit edition of Vista as opposed to the 32-bit that everyone&#8217;s used to.  This may cause some problems with software compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

